Trump-appointed judge strikes down FTC ban on noncompete agreements

FTC spokesperson Victoria Graham said that the decision “does not prevent the FTC from addressing noncompetes through case-by-case enforcement actions” and said that the agency is “seriously considering” appealing the Texas court’s decision.

A federal judge in Texas has struck down the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) ban on noncompete agreements that was set to go into effect on Sept. 4.

In April, the FTC voted to ban noncompete agreements—those pesky clauses that employers often force their workers to sign which effectively bar them from starting their own business or finding a new job in the same field within a certain area or timeframe after leaving their current job.

An estimated 30 million American workers are currently affected by noncompete clauses—that’s roughly 18% of the US workforce. These clauses have been shown to lower workers’ pay and restrict their opportunity and mobility.

US District Judge Ada Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote that “the FTC lacks statutory authority” to ban most noncompetes, and that the rule was “arbitrary and capricious,” in her opinion. Therefore, the ban will “not be enforced or otherwise take effect” as planned.

Brown issued a preliminary order against the FTC’s ban in early July. The order was issued in a lawsuit brought by Ryan LLC, a company owned by a Republican mega donor and tax adviser to former president Donald Trump. Business groups including the US Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable had a hand in bringing this case to court as well.

Victoria Graham, an FTC spokesperson, told HR Brew that the decision “does not prevent the FTC from addressing noncompetes through case-by-case enforcement actions” and said that the agency is “seriously considering” appealing the Texas court’s decision.

“We are disappointed by Judge Brown’s decision and will keep fighting to stop noncompetes that restrict the economic liberty of hard working Americans, hamper economic growth, limit innovation, and depress wages,” Graham additionally told The Hill.

In contrast, a federal judge in Pennsylvania rejected a similar challenge to the ban put forth by tree-trimming company ATS Tree Services later in July. US District Judge Kelley Hodge in Philadelphia—a Biden appointee—reasoned in her opinion that the FTC has the authority “to prevent unfair methods of competition in commerce” under the 1914 Federal Trade Commission Act.

Josh Robbins, an attorney who represented ATS at the Pacific Legal Foundation, said the company was “pleased” by Tuesday’s decision.

“This is a great first step and we expect litigation over the ban to continue,” Robbins said.

Support Our Cause

Thank you for taking the time to read our work. Before you go, we hope you'll consider supporting our values-driven journalism, which has always strived to make clear what's really at stake for Nevadans and our future.

Since day one, our goal here at The Nevadan / El Nevadense has always been to empower people across the state with fact-based news and information. We believe that when people are armed with knowledge about what's happening in their local, state, and federal governments—including who is working on their behalf and who is actively trying to block efforts aimed at improving the daily lives of Nevada families—they will be inspired to become civically engaged.

Frank Alejandre, Community Editor

Give $5 Give $25 Give $50 Other

Your support keeps us going

Help us continue delivering fact-based news to Nevadans