Project 2025 would threaten women’s access to emergency contraception

Project 2025 specifically states that certain types of emergency contraception would be excluded from the no cost coverage provided by the Affordable Care Act should it be implemented. 

For over a decade, most American women have been able to access birth control and other preventive health services at no cost due to the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Project 2025—a 900-page plan put together by the Trump-aligned, right-wing Heritage Foundation—wants to change that by excluding certain forms of emergency contraception—like Plan B and other forms of the morning after pill—from no cost coverage.

The ACA requires that most private health insurance plans provide no-cost coverage for recommended preventative services, without coinsurance, copayment, or deductible. This provision includes every form of birth control approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–including Plan B and other forms of emergency contraception.

According to a new analysis from the Center for American Progress (CAP), if Project 2025 is put into effect, 48 million American women could lose their guaranteed no-cost access to emergency contraception.

In Nevada specifically, 426,000 women of reproductive age–or those ages 15-49–could lose guaranteed no-cost emergency contraception coverage.

If this were to happen, these women wouldn’t have access to that contraception when they need it. And according to a new national survey conducted by the US Census Bureau, nearly one-quarter of reproductive-age women who have ever had sex with a man report having used emergency contraception at some point so far in their lives. 

Democratic efforts to protect access to birth control

Meanwhile, reproductive rights advocates in Nevada have fought to protect access to birth control in light of Roe v. Wade’s reversal two years ago.

They aimed to amend Nevada’s constitution through a referendum initiative earlier this year. The petition sought to codify protections of reproductive care, a blanket term that includes matters related to pregnancy, birth control, vasectomies, tubal ligation, abortion, miscarriage management and infertility care. The state Supreme Court, however, ruled that the initiative was unconstitutional earlier this year.

Democratic US Senator Jacky Rosen has also worked to restore reproductive freedoms and oppose anti-choice efforts to restrict access to reproductive rights. Earlier this year, she joined legislation to protect IVF treatments federally, for example. She also helped introduce the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act, which would have protected health care professionals from being prosecuted for providing reproductive care to their patients, had Senate Republicans not blocked its passage. She also recently voted to protect the constitutional right to access birth control.

On the federal level, Democratic lawmakers have attempted to protect birth control access, as well. But Senate Republicans recently blocked a bill that would have guaranteed access to birth control under federal law.

Specifically, the bill would have cemented the right for Americans to obtain and use birth control without government interference. It would have also protected the right of health care providers to distribute information about contraception and provide it to patients, and also ensured that patients had a right to access condoms, birth control pills, intrauterine devices (IUDs), vasectomies, and more.

Thirty-eight Republicans voted against the bill and nine failed to show up for the vote, while 49 Democrats voted for the bill, with one missing the vote. In accordance with Senate rules, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) changed his vote to no at the last minute, which will allow him the chance to reintroduce the bill again at a later date.

President Joe Biden was quick to condemn Republicans for blocking the bill, calling it an “unacceptable” decision.

“My administration alongside Democrats in Congress will continue to fight to protect access to reproductive health care and keep taking action to strengthen access to affordable, high-quality contraception,” the president said in a statement. “And we will continue to urge Congress to restore the protections of Roe v. Wade in federal law and safeguard the right to contraception once and for all.”

Support Our Cause

Thank you for taking the time to read our work. Before you go, we hope you'll consider supporting our values-driven journalism, which has always strived to make clear what's really at stake for Nevadans and our future.

Since day one, our goal here at The Nevadan / El Nevadense has always been to empower people across the state with fact-based news and information. We believe that when people are armed with knowledge about what's happening in their local, state, and federal governments—including who is working on their behalf and who is actively trying to block efforts aimed at improving the daily lives of Nevada families—they will be inspired to become civically engaged.

Frank Alejandre, Community Editor

Give $5 Give $25 Give $50 Other

Your support keeps us going

Help us continue delivering fact-based news to Nevadans