Project 2025 calls for repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, which would cause millions of American seniors to pay more for their prescription drugs.
Over the past two years, seniors on Medicare have benefited from reductions in drug costs due to President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), with more on the way next year.
But if Donald Trump wins the November election and implements Project 2025, a conservative blueprint for a second Trump term, as many as 18.5 million Medicare enrollees could be forced to pay higher costs for their medications, according to a new analysis from the Center for American Progress.
How the Inflation Reduction Act saves seniors money
The Inflation Reduction Act reformed Medicare to lower drug costs for millions of American seniors with Medicare Part D coverage, which covers prescription drugs.
Beginning last year, the law implemented a $35 monthly cap on insulin for seniors on Medicare.
As a result, nearly 11,000 Nevada seniors on Medicare who use insulin are now saving an average of $439 per year on their prescription.
The Inflation Reduction Act also made vaccines covered under Medicare Part D free and allowed enrollees to spread out their total annual Medicare Part D out-of-pocket costs over the course of the year, allowing them to better afford their health care costs.
The law has also expanded access to federal subsidies to help low-income American seniors cover their healthcare costs, providing support worth an estimated $5,900 per year, according to the Social Security Administration.
In 2025, another key provision will go into effect, capping Medicare beneficiaries’ out-of-pocket costs on prescription drugs to $2,000 per year. It’s estimated that this new cap will save seniors who take expensive drugs for conditions like cancer thousands of dollars each year.
These policies, however, are now under threat.
The threat of Project 2025
Project 2025—a 900-page plan put together by the Trump-aligned, right-wing Heritage Foundation—calls for repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, which would cause millions of Medicare enrollees to pay more out-of-pocket for their prescription drugs.
In Nevada, an estimated 12,000 Medicare Part D enrollees could pay more for their prescription drugs without the Inflation Reduction Act’s $2,000 annual out-of-pocket cap. An even higher number of Nevada seniors and others on Medicare—143,000 people—would pay an average of $434 more per year out of pocket for their medications if all of the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug provisions were repealed.
Furthermore, repealing the Inflation Reduction Act would end the law’s Medicare drug price negotiation provision.
The law authorized Medicare to negotiate prices for expensive drugs with pharmaceutical companies for the first time. The first set of negotiations kicked off earlier this year, despite legal challenges from pharmaceutical companies. These negotiations have the potential to lower the prices Medicare pays for select drugs, which would translate to significant savings for enrollees.
The provision will significantly lower out-of-pocket drug costs for many of the over 427,000 Nevada seniors enrolled in Medicare Part D coverage.
“Project 2025 treats seniors’ access to affordable drugs as collateral damage,” the Center for American Progress states. “This dangerous agenda prioritizes Big Pharma’s bottom line at the expense of millions of Medicare Part D enrollees who, if Project 2025 is enacted, may once again have to pay more out-of-pocket for the medications they need, impeding both access and affordability.”
Support Our Cause
Thank you for taking the time to read our work. Before you go, we hope you'll consider supporting our values-driven journalism, which has always strived to make clear what's really at stake for Nevadans and our future.
Since day one, our goal here at The Nevadan / El Nevadense has always been to empower people across the state with fact-based news and information. We believe that when people are armed with knowledge about what's happening in their local, state, and federal governments—including who is working on their behalf and who is actively trying to block efforts aimed at improving the daily lives of Nevada families—they will be inspired to become civically engaged.
Opinion: El Proyecto 2025 es un Desastre Nuclear para Nevada
Durante décadas, un tema ha unido a los políticos de Nevada a nivel local, estatal y federal: Yucca Mountain. La mayoría de los habitantes de Nevada...
Opinion: Project 2025 is a Nuclear Disaster for Nevada
For decades, one issue has united Nevada politicians across local, state, and federal levels: Yucca Mountain. Most Nevadans believe developing Yucca...
The far-right loses its mind over Kamala Harris
A slew of racist, sexist, and outright bizarre conspiracy theories flooded the internet after Joe Biden decided to end his campaign and endorsed...
Who is J.D. Vance? Here’s what to know about Trump’s VP pick.
Vance has compared abortion to murder and slavery, has criticized divorce, and has suggested people in “violent” marriages should try to work things...
Conservative leaders want to make it harder to get divorced
No-fault divorce laws have contributed to lower national rates of intimate partner violence, particularly against women. Some conservative leaders...
Not just abortion: IVF ruling next phase in the right’s war on reproductive freedom
Nearly two years after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, another court is using that ruling to go after one of the anti-abortion right’s...